Thread:DanteLee123/@comment-1672596-20190303144655/@comment-1672596-20190304175611

Would you have rather we just gave the bare bones amount in the article via cliffs-cliffs-notes to such an extent that the article is a sentence long at most saying something like, for Raidou as an example, "power hungry monster who got killed by his niece"? Because that's the only other way I can do it, making it so short it doesn't really allow for any details at all. Heck, if anything, a wiki chock-full of detailed facts is far more practical than the example I listed above.

Besides, if I were a person reading the wiki, and I, say, didn't see Tamaki in there, I would have thought, literally, that Honoka and Tamaki never even caught eye of one another, even when that obviously isn't the case, actually interacting in one of Tamaki's episodes (or to put it another way, to paraphrase Jocasta Nu from Star Wars: "If it isn't shown, it doesn't exist"). Heck, on Bulbagarden, they actually used that as a reason to not mention in the episode summary for Grating Spaces that JJM were the painters, which left some confusion on my end until I settled the matter and made sure it was added in. We state the facts, period. And BTW, I've actually read quite a few highly detailed, even tedious stuff before, and I know others can as well because many of the stuff I've read that were too long and tedious are books that have sold rather well (case in point, Christopher A. Ferrara's Liberty: The God that Failed). So no, actually, mentioning Honoka and Tamaki's interactions are still notable enough to note that, yes, they did indeed interact.